On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 02:04:59 GMT, "Robkamel"
<dwarner1 DeleteThis @rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>Whew........that was one long leap in logic. LOL The ability to drive (or
>ride in this case) is a priviledge, not a right. Thus, there can be no
>"right" to choose, just like there in no right to choose whether or not to
>stop at stop lights under the guise of "freedom to choose" or "freedom of
>expression". On the other hand, if you can convince enough lawmakers to
>grant the priviledge of choosing whether or not to risk your life, thats
>cool, I just hope those of us who are smarter don't get stuck paying the
>bills. This whole helmet thing is only a hairsbreadth away from fighting for
>your right to nail shit to your forehead with a nailgun.
come on everyone, listen to Robkamel..........tomorrow he's gonna tell
us which books we should read he's soooo smart<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Should wearing a helmet be optional for motorcycle riders?..