 |
|
|
|
Related Topics:
| It's time to wave black flag at Gobert, insists Gardner - It's time to wave black flag at Gobert, insists Gardner Email Print Normal font Large font By Peter Mckay March 5, 2006 FORMER star rider Anthony Gobert should be banned from racing, at least in the short term, because of his drug..
Sell your bike, truck, boat, car and parts free -
Suzuki SV650 and Synthetic Oil - Hi All, Does anyone know if it's okay to use a synthetic oil in a Suzuki SV650? Thanks and regards Barry Esmore
ouchies... bike hits deer vid.. - 7.5 MB Well worth the download As you can see his leathers did nothing it all.. it was all impact damage. paulh
New to bike riding in AUS - Hi all, I have driven bikes (150 cc) for @ 10 years but not in AUS. In AUS I need to start with 250cc as per law and hence my choice is narrowed down to 250cc. I like bikes and wanted one for drive. Most likely, I will be keeping the bike..
|
|
|
Next: film review: One Chance to Win
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Jan 22, 2006
Posts: 164
|
(Msg. 91) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:13 am
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: aus>motorcycles (more info?)
|
|
|
Nev.. wrote:
> On Feb 28, 1:00 pm, Yeebers <Y....DeleteThis@yeeb.yeeb> wrote:
>> Argh ! Nortons ! The scourge of the PC world. It's more trouble than
>> what it's supposed to protect you from..
>
>
> He's talking about Nortons utilities, not whatever it is nowadays that
> gets marketed by whoever Norton sold his name to.
>
> Nev..
> '07 XB12X
Symantec is who he sold his name to. Like selling the copyright on your DNA,
--
Cheers
Andrew |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Mar 19, 2007
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 92) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
George W Frost wrote:
> Haven't seen these before, if you haven't, then enjoy reading them
>
Thanks George, very droll.
I once was riding with a group of oldies, when a fellow came up after we
parked, complaining to my friend that she had ignored his friendly wave.
He got that off his chest, but didn't stick around to hear the reason
why. It was a full time job controlling her vintage bike, with the usual
controls plus responsibility for manual ignition advance/retard, air
control, hand operated gear shift, and manual oil pump. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 06, 2005
Posts: 1823
|
(Msg. 93) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
John Lamp wrote:
> JL wrote:
>
>> On Feb 27, 9:36 pm, "Knobdoodle" <knobdoo....TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "JL" <jlitt....TakeThisOut@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:9d6382a6-7a4c-4e4f-bf5d-1ce6fab1e312@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> On Feb 27, 5:36 pm, Yeebers <Y....TakeThisOut@yeeb.yeeb> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Not only that .. the way it goes on about poor overworked processors
>>>> and
>>>> cryptic commands made me think of a 386/25 running Dos 3 as being 'Teh
>>>> ul71m4t3 m3g4 c0mpu73h!' ..
>>>
>>> Aww now come on, if it's a 386 then you would have been at least on
>>> 4.0 (and more likely 5)
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~```
>>>
>>> DOS 3.1 was standard for 386s. (and 3.0 for 286s)
>
> DOS 4 was a non event - DOS 3 with a few apps and a menuing system,
> which virually no one used! WOFTAM!!
>
> Cheers
> Goaty
It did have limited support for extended memory though... which was
useful when loading drivers above the 640k barrier.
Most games wouldn't run with CD-Rom drivers and video drivers and sound
drivers installed into below 640k memory.
G-S >> Stay informed about: Reasons Not To Wave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 06, 2005
Posts: 1823
|
(Msg. 94) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Theo Bekkers wrote:
> Knobdoodle wrote:
>> "JL" <jlittler.DeleteThis@my-deja.com> wrote
>
>> Aww now come on, if it's a 386 then you would have been at least on
>> 4.0 (and more likely 5)
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~```
>> DOS 3.1 was standard for 386s. (and 3.0 for 286s)
>
> I got gypped with my 2.11 then?
>
> Bastards!
>
> Theo
> It was actually pre 286. 8080 running at 10 meg, woohoo!
>
Are you sure it wasn't an 8088 (or possibly an 8086) ?
G-S >> Stay informed about: Reasons Not To Wave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 11, 2005
Posts: 2026
|
(Msg. 95) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
G-S wrote:
> Theo Bekkers wrote:
>> I got gypped with my 2.11 then?
>>
>> Bastards!
>> It was actually pre 286. 8080 running at 10 meg, woohoo!
> Are you sure it wasn't an 8088 (or possibly an 8086) ?
Possible, I think the alz-something is kicking in. It's actually still
sitting in the shed.
Theo >> Stay informed about: Reasons Not To Wave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 21, 2007
Posts: 133
|
(Msg. 96) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 10, 2008
Posts: 51
|
(Msg. 97) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
OMG The best thing about WME was that it wasn't W95 .. that it came
after W98 was a worry though.
GB wrote:
> John Lamp <John.Lamp DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in news:13sbkbad3lm7q53
> @corp.supernews.com:
>> DOS 4 was a non event - DOS 3 with a few apps and a menuing system,
>> which virually no one used! WOFTAM!!
>
> DOS 4 was to DOS what Windows Me was to Windows.
>
>
> GB
> --
> .sig >> Stay informed about: Reasons Not To Wave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 02, 2005
Posts: 63
|
(Msg. 98) Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:42 am
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 14, 2007
Posts: 45
|
(Msg. 99) Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Theo Bekkers wrote:
> Knobdoodle wrote:
>
>>"JL" <jlittler DeleteThis @my-deja.com> wrote
>
>
>>Aww now come on, if it's a 386 then you would have been at least on
>>4.0 (and more likely 5)
>>
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~```
>>DOS 3.1 was standard for 386s. (and 3.0 for 286s)
>
>
> I got gypped with my 2.11 then?
>
> Bastards!
>
> Theo
> It was actually pre 286. 8080 running at 10 meg, woohoo!
8080 Pffft! Z80 rules!
Cheers
Goaty
--
_--_|\ John Lamp - in beautiful downtown Highton
/ \ IRC:Goaty@aus.moto DoD#:1906 Ulysses#:10185 Vulcan Nomad
\_.--._/ http://www.gorider.cjb.net/ Phone: 0409 512 254
v mailto:John.Lamp@gmail.com Fax: 03 5227 2151
Hear no Evo, See no Evo, Fear no Evo >> Stay informed about: Reasons Not To Wave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 10, 2008
Posts: 51
|
(Msg. 100) Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Reasons Not To Wave. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I was more of a 6502 man at the time myself.
John Lamp wrote:
> Theo Bekkers wrote:
>
>> Knobdoodle wrote:
>>
>>> "JL" <jlittler.DeleteThis@my-deja.com> wrote
>>
>>
>>> Aww now come on, if it's a 386 then you would have been at least on
>>> 4.0 (and more likely 5)
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~```
>>>
>>> DOS 3.1 was standard for 386s. (and 3.0 for 286s)
>>
>>
>> I got gypped with my 2.11 then?
>>
>> Bastards!
>>
>> Theo
>> It was actually pre 286. 8080 running at 10 meg, woohoo!
>
> 8080 Pffft! Z80 rules!
>
> Cheers
> Goaty >> Stay informed about: Reasons Not To Wave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
