Nicholas Weaver wrote:
> The basic idea is a clutch with ramps, so if the wheel is turning more
> force than the engine, the ramps open the clutch and effectively
> disengage the clutch.
Yes, but -- if your description were 100% correct, engine
braking would not be possible. There is some torque threshhold
at which the ramps begin to open, and the "feel" is determined
in large part by the selection of friction plates.
It's possible for downshifting to create the torque effect of
an engine with hundreds of HP, at least for a fraction of a
second. Certainly enough to cause the rear end to hop, shake,
rattle and sometimes roll (dep. on the the front end is now
doing).
Some of the MotoGP bikes have fly-by-wire shifting in which the
throttle is blipped to the precise matching speed. Not a bad
use for a computer, and our bikes already have computers....
The mechanical design of the STM Evo is a bit puzzling to me,
much messier than software

Of course, Suzuki's 2003
season and their bike-with-computer-virus reassures me that
the fancy new red clutch under the cover is a good thing.
> The one in the new Monster adds an additional trick: its a
> "slipper/gripper" clutch: when the engine is putting more force, the
> ramps close the clutch tighter, allowing the clutch to use lighter
> springs (therefore a lighter level action) while stil being effective.
This must be the wet clutch in the 620 and 800? The
STM Evo slipper's spring feels much lighter than the stock.
> Bike has a good summary in the March issue.
Is there an online link?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: a fool and his money...