Victorian motorcycle crash stats - we're to blame?

In article <70800dae.0403231808.48e238ed.DeleteThis@posting.google.com>,
za2bb.DeleteThis@optusnet.com.au (BT Humble) wrote:

 > I'm not to blame - I've never crashed and died in Victoria.

I did once, but I picked myself up and left before anybody noticed...

big (A Good Rider never crashes and dies in Victoria!)
--
"A magazine here has a bunch of bonobo's in the zoo and a bunch of
market analysts from major banks picking stocks weekly. So far the
bonobo's are turning in a profit and the analysts lose money. The
banks haven't made the logical step yet." - Lieven Marchand in SDM<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Zebee Johnstone wrote:
  > > Sayeth moike <moike RemoveThis @telstra.com>:
   > >>
   > >> Like this one?
<font color=brown>   > >> <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://allen.dnsalias.net/~jason/Police-research04s3.pdf</font" target="_blank">http://allen.dnsalias.net/~jason/Police-research04s3.pdf</font</a>>

 > given it's a cop report, I would think a starting point would be
 > "breaking a road rule". Of course the kicker is speed, how do they
 > determine it?

And it is a litle disappointing that "the researchers adoped the
OTS methodolgy in the hope that it would extend and confirm their
current understanding of the interplay of antecedent factors..."

clare<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->