Thank you all for your outstanding input- I didn't know how much
'aviation-specific' information I should put into a post on a motorycle
tech board- but I guess gear-heads are gear heads, so here's a bit more
info;)
About me, I am an engineer with a minor in physics who reads books and
papers about thermodynamic engine theory for fun... Currently I have
very little machine-shop access, and I am planning to do most of my
custom part fabrication through emachineshop (I've used them repeatedly
in the past and am very satisfied with the results). All of this said,
I am acutely aware that I am a 'sophmore' in the truest sense- a 'wise
fool' who understand just enough theory to think I know what I'm
talking about, but in reality has very little practical experience and
doesn't having a clue...
Price is only a moderate factor, if I was absolutely working 'on the
cheap', then my choice of engines is clear - I would go with lightly
turboed convair motor (4psi boost, 110-120hp)... I could buy a 0 time
flight-read convair motor for as little as 5k, and build one myself for
half that...
A large part of this though is my own sense of pride and love of
'tinkering'... If I was just going for cheap and quick to fly, I could
easily buy a used certified aircraft for half the price of a kit... I
am looking to make a vehicle that is truly 'mine'...
Now - as for specific motorcycle issues-
Heat dissipation - always an issue of course, but often times one that
can be worked around - higher-flow coolant pump with a larger,
well-ducted radiator for example (water cooled)... Give me the expected
fuel flow and power output, and figuring out the waste-heat energy
component and hense necessary heat dissapation capability is all
relatively simple mathmatics... Granted, I'm acutely aware that theory
and practice are two very different things.
Mechanical stresses are _much_ more of an issue... one of my largest
fears with a motorcycle engine is the need to run the engine at very
high piston velocities to achieve the power ranges I'm looking for... I
would hope to someone alleviate this by running a boosted engine
optimized for low engine speeds, and keeping the engine under half of
its design speed... This trades piston speed for torque load on the
internal components - but if the engine is engineered well enough, this
is often a worthwhile trade-off.
The other thing I am actively considering is some form of
turbo-componding (reverse supercharger hooked tot he exhaust, feeding
exhaust energy directly back into the driveshaft)... the obvious
advantages of such an arrangement are the concept of purely 'free'
energy - that is, energy that would have otherwise been completely
wasted out the tail pipe getting put back into the system... the
gearing requirements for turbo compounding are fairly stringent
however... I need to look more into how to assure that my exhaust
turbine drives the shaft, and not the other way around...
Other motorcycle engines which have caught my eye are the Harley
V-twins... Specifically, taking two 1200cc Evolution motors and running
them on the same drive shaft, opposed 180 degrees and lying flat (
think - >o< ). I really like the highly modular design of the harley
engine... air cooling is also a huge plus, and it seems to me that
designing a special aviation piston shaft (aluminium piston liner with
an aerodynamic magnesium casing for weight/heat better heat
dissipation) would be a fairly trivial matter (I've already got the
part designed in emachineshop). Then use a heavy-bike cam-shaft
designed for best torque at low engine speeds and run the whole system
through a 1.5:1 PSRU, and theoretically at least, I have a pretty
aviation engine... The devil, of course, is in the details - such an
engine would required pretty heavy fabrication to one of the evolution
engine cases to allow the drive shaft to pass through to the rear case,
something that I am _sure_ will require 10X more effort to do safely
than my most liberal time estimates...
In terms of certified engines, the Rotax 912/914 are at the top of my
list. I carry my father's and grandfather's bias against continental
engines (between the two of them, they've lost 5 continentals in-flight
to various manufacturing defects over 30 years)...
I have a special love of the Wankel rotary concept... I just think its
frustrating that no-one has taken the time to produce a true aviation
version of it... In theory, it is a relatively ideal aircraft engine,
sharing an operating profile (bet effeciancy at high-output, few moving
parts) resemblign turbine more than reciprocating... Unfortunately,
Mazda has chosen to save money on their B-series blocks utilizing
cast-iron instead of aluminium or other 'modern' engine materials,
meaning that the mazda is only power-to-weight efficiant as a
replacement for an 0-320 or 0-360 engine (and at this, it runs
substantially higher output than I would be comfortable with)... My
'idea' engine would be to replace the B13 block with an aluminum
housing, and run the whole engine de-tuned in the 115hp cruise 150hp
peak range with a mount weight of 230lbs... but until such a housing
exists, the B13 is simply too heavy for my purposes, all other
considerations aside.
>> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally.