Welcome to MotorcycleForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally.

 
   Motorcycle Magazine (Home) -> Tech RSS
Next:  Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally.  
Author Message
scott.cragg

External


Since: Mar 04, 2006
Posts: 2



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 12:07 am
Post subject: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally.
Archived from groups: rec>motorcycles>tech (more info?)

Hello All,

Recently, I have been taking a very serious look at building a
kit-plane. Among the many aspects of this has been the search for an
engine. All of the various kits in my price range call for an 80-140
horse powerplant, obviously- lightweight and reliablility are key.

For many reasons (cost actually being among the least), certified
aircraft engines are not particularly appealing to me, and I'm
currently researching my alternatives.

There is quite the cottage industry currently in Auto->Aviation
adaptations, centering primarily around Subaru and Mazda rotary
engines... This works great in the 400lb, 200hp+ class of engines, its
not particularly useful to my selection of lighter airframes.

Hense my question-

I am looking for an engine with the following properties-
- Total Gross mount Weight < 240lbs (Engine + intake/induction +
exhaust + cooling)
- power ~ 150hp max... able to run at 115hp output for extended periods
of time (I'll use reduced gearing to go from engine speed to prop
speed, so I don't care what speed the engine needs to run at)
- Decent fuel burn - 5-8 gph at 75% power (the aformentioned 115hp
setting)
- RELIABLE

Are there any particular motorcycle engines that I should look at?

After a few days of looking, There has been one which has really caught
my eye- The BMW 'flying brick' motors, K1100 and K1200... Everything
I read online lauds them for outstanding reliability... They produce a
decent 100-130hp that could easily be geared down to my target RPM, and
they seem to have a long history of aftermarket forced induction, which
I would hope let me reduce some of the strain on the engine by giving
it a modest 4-8psi boost and then running at a lower rpm for my target
115hp cruise power...

The one thing I cannot find for the life of me, about any motorcycle
engine, is the engine weight and dimensions itself... How much does the
K1200 engine weight? (all accessories attached, no transmission). What
are its external dimensions... would a modestly turbocharged variant
fall under my target weight?

What about thoughts on reliability? Ease of conversion?

Any and all input would be greatly appreciated:)

-ESC

 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mel

External


Since: Feb 20, 2006
Posts: 4



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Forget it,.. unless you want to get particularly skilled at glider
flying.

Motorcycle motors have tremendous power-to-weight ratios, but they are
designed to run at high power settings for only short periods of time.


It is a matter of heat transfer. These engines are very efficient when
run according to the way the experts designed them. They specifically
did NOT design them to run at max power for hours.

You could derate them a lot, but then to get the efficiency you'd have
to change everything -- cam, intake, exhaust, fuel, ignition,
compression, etc. Then, after you have invested $10k in those mods,
you'd have a motor that was heavier than an aircraft motor designed by
folks who know what they are doing,.. you'd have spent more, and you
would have a completely unknown/untested powerplant. YOU are the one
that puts your tender pink ass in the machine that uses that motor.
Most of us would rather have the R&D be a little less threatening.

You are not the first guy that thought of this. You are perhaps the
millionth. If you ever got to the point of actually testing the thing,
you would be one of hundreds, most of whom, after many hours and bucks,
reverted to motors designed by engineers for aircraft. In the long
run, it actually is cheaper to buy an aircraft motor, especially if you
figure in hospital bills (or funeral expenses) into the cost of a
motorcycle conversion.

The term "aircraft motor" includes, for your purposes, Rotax motors and
the like. Some of these are certficated (meaning expensive) and some
are for us kitbuilders (same motor, but cheaper). There are all kinds
of good aircraft motors (2 and 4 stroke) that can be had for several
thousand bucks. Cheap. Safe. Easy.

Please don't interpret the following info as bragging -- I offer it
just to establish some credentials to add some credibility to my
comments. I have an A&P, two Aero degrees, CFI/II/MEI, been riding
motorcycles for 46 years, retired USAF fighter WSO, build and fly
gyrocopters (powered by Rotax, Hirth, Subaru), and have also seriously
thought about using a motorcycle motor for an aircraft.

What horsepower range will your aircraft need? What kind of flying
will you be doing?

How much building experience do you have? How much help will you have?
What shop capability do you have?

Anyway, my suggestion is to use a motor designed for aircraft. It'll
be so much safer, and, unless you hit on some magic combination that no
one else has found, it will perform better and be cheaper in the long
run.

E-mail me at mricxxxflo.DeleteThis@dr.com (remove the xxx) if you want to chat
about more details. Or, we can chat some more here.

Good luck.

 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Rick Cortese

External


Since: Feb 27, 2004
Posts: 181



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

scott.cragg DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Recently, I have been taking a very serious look at building a
> kit-plane. Among the many aspects of this has been the search for an
> engine. All of the various kits in my price range call for an 80-140
> horse powerplant, obviously- lightweight and reliablility are key.
>
> For many reasons (cost actually being among the least), certified
> aircraft engines are not particularly appealing to me, and I'm
> currently researching my alternatives.
>
> There is quite the cottage industry currently in Auto->Aviation
> adaptations, centering primarily around Subaru and Mazda rotary
> engines... This works great in the 400lb, 200hp+ class of engines, its
> not particularly useful to my selection of lighter airframes.
>
> Hense my question-
>
> I am looking for an engine with the following properties-
> - Total Gross mount Weight < 240lbs (Engine + intake/induction +
> exhaust + cooling)
> - power ~ 150hp max... able to run at 115hp output for extended periods
> of time (I'll use reduced gearing to go from engine speed to prop
> speed, so I don't care what speed the engine needs to run at)
> - Decent fuel burn - 5-8 gph at 75% power (the aformentioned 115hp
> setting)
> - RELIABLE
>
> Are there any particular motorcycle engines that I should look at?


Just my op but you would probably be better off w/o a motorcycle engine.
115hp extended and 150hp max are at the upper limit of what is
available. The only engines that come as separate engine/transmission
that I can think of are the V-twin Harley types. You may want to look at
someplace like Dennis Kirk to get and idea of what is available. You
could get one of the unit engine/transmission types to work, but it
would cost a bundle to modify. Other then the BMWs you mentioned the
only other engines known for that type of reliability would be the Honda
Goldwing.

You may find a snowmobiles would make better candidates as engine donors.
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
scott.cragg

External


Since: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 5



(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 3:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Thank you all for your outstanding input- I didn't know how much
'aviation-specific' information I should put into a post on a motorycle
tech board- but I guess gear-heads are gear heads, so here's a bit more
info;)

About me, I am an engineer with a minor in physics who reads books and
papers about thermodynamic engine theory for fun... Currently I have
very little machine-shop access, and I am planning to do most of my
custom part fabrication through emachineshop (I've used them repeatedly
in the past and am very satisfied with the results). All of this said,
I am acutely aware that I am a 'sophmore' in the truest sense- a 'wise
fool' who understand just enough theory to think I know what I'm
talking about, but in reality has very little practical experience and
doesn't having a clue...

Price is only a moderate factor, if I was absolutely working 'on the
cheap', then my choice of engines is clear - I would go with lightly
turboed convair motor (4psi boost, 110-120hp)... I could buy a 0 time
flight-read convair motor for as little as 5k, and build one myself for
half that...

A large part of this though is my own sense of pride and love of
'tinkering'... If I was just going for cheap and quick to fly, I could
easily buy a used certified aircraft for half the price of a kit... I
am looking to make a vehicle that is truly 'mine'...

Now - as for specific motorcycle issues-

Heat dissipation - always an issue of course, but often times one that
can be worked around - higher-flow coolant pump with a larger,
well-ducted radiator for example (water cooled)... Give me the expected
fuel flow and power output, and figuring out the waste-heat energy
component and hense necessary heat dissapation capability is all
relatively simple mathmatics... Granted, I'm acutely aware that theory
and practice are two very different things.

Mechanical stresses are _much_ more of an issue... one of my largest
fears with a motorcycle engine is the need to run the engine at very
high piston velocities to achieve the power ranges I'm looking for... I
would hope to someone alleviate this by running a boosted engine
optimized for low engine speeds, and keeping the engine under half of
its design speed... This trades piston speed for torque load on the
internal components - but if the engine is engineered well enough, this
is often a worthwhile trade-off.

The other thing I am actively considering is some form of
turbo-componding (reverse supercharger hooked tot he exhaust, feeding
exhaust energy directly back into the driveshaft)... the obvious
advantages of such an arrangement are the concept of purely 'free'
energy - that is, energy that would have otherwise been completely
wasted out the tail pipe getting put back into the system... the
gearing requirements for turbo compounding are fairly stringent
however... I need to look more into how to assure that my exhaust
turbine drives the shaft, and not the other way around...

Other motorcycle engines which have caught my eye are the Harley
V-twins... Specifically, taking two 1200cc Evolution motors and running
them on the same drive shaft, opposed 180 degrees and lying flat (
think - >o< ). I really like the highly modular design of the harley
engine... air cooling is also a huge plus, and it seems to me that
designing a special aviation piston shaft (aluminium piston liner with
an aerodynamic magnesium casing for weight/heat better heat
dissipation) would be a fairly trivial matter (I've already got the
part designed in emachineshop). Then use a heavy-bike cam-shaft
designed for best torque at low engine speeds and run the whole system
through a 1.5:1 PSRU, and theoretically at least, I have a pretty
aviation engine... The devil, of course, is in the details - such an
engine would required pretty heavy fabrication to one of the evolution
engine cases to allow the drive shaft to pass through to the rear case,
something that I am _sure_ will require 10X more effort to do safely
than my most liberal time estimates...

In terms of certified engines, the Rotax 912/914 are at the top of my
list. I carry my father's and grandfather's bias against continental
engines (between the two of them, they've lost 5 continentals in-flight
to various manufacturing defects over 30 years)...

I have a special love of the Wankel rotary concept... I just think its
frustrating that no-one has taken the time to produce a true aviation
version of it... In theory, it is a relatively ideal aircraft engine,
sharing an operating profile (bet effeciancy at high-output, few moving
parts) resemblign turbine more than reciprocating... Unfortunately,
Mazda has chosen to save money on their B-series blocks utilizing
cast-iron instead of aluminium or other 'modern' engine materials,
meaning that the mazda is only power-to-weight efficiant as a
replacement for an 0-320 or 0-360 engine (and at this, it runs
substantially higher output than I would be comfortable with)... My
'idea' engine would be to replace the B13 block with an aluminum
housing, and run the whole engine de-tuned in the 115hp cruise 150hp
peak range with a mount weight of 230lbs... but until such a housing
exists, the B13 is simply too heavy for my purposes, all other
considerations aside.
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
LJ1

External


Since: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 88



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 10:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Wow, I though I'd seen everything. For years the question to Harley dudes
was "If Harley made an airliner, would you fly on it?" No one ever told me
they would. The thought of trusting my life on the whims of a 40 year old
car engine that wasn't specifically engineered to be on a plane and hasn't
been maintained like aircraft engine is just a little disturbing. My old
man and brother went down in a then 35-year old Cessna 195 that had been
meticulously maintained and professionally annualed.

If you really must, than the least you could do is go with a current engine.
What's wrong with an air-cooled boxer? The current 1200 (or 1170 or
whatever) from the RT's and GS beemers will get you 110hp and plenty of
torque, are air/oil cooled and only burn 2 gal/hour at highway speeds,
though I don't know what that would translate for you. Lots of luck.
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
scott.cragg

External


Since: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 5



(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:35 am
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

You see, I don't know anything about the reliability of the Harley
V-Twin- all I see is a (relatively) simple, modular air-cooled engine
with the necessary output...

That's why I'm on here asking you motorcycle gear-heads;)

The BMW boxer has also grabbed my attention... (although at this point
I'm pretty heavily leaning towards the convair)...

is there any chance someone could get me the Dimensions and weight (all
accessories minus transmission) of the K series and R series engines?
I can't find that information online anywhere.
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
scott.cragg

External


Since: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 5



(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:48 am
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> The Corvair motors are getting more and more popular. Six cylinders
> means they run smooth, and essentially replicate the "dinosaur motors"
> that are in certified aircraft, but are a LOT cheaper to maintain.
> There are also some pretty available (and cheap) performance bits
> available for them.

Yeah, I'm definitely leaning towards the corvair... Tons of builder
support and many flying examples... I'll probably save the 'innovation'
to my second plane;)

> This is why water-cooled engines are getting so popular - finding a
> way to plumb air through a small radiator is a LOT easier than making
> sure every part of the motor has good air flow. For the same reason,
> I doubt you could even build an air-cooled car today (no way to get
> enough air through the engine compartment with all the extra equipment
> that lives under the modern car's hood.

It does cut both ways, water-cooling is a pain because water is limited
to ~212 degrees F. before you boil your radiator over... This is bad
in both the thermodynamic sense (higher combustion chamber temperature
= higher combustion efficiancy) and complexity (a staged heat-exchanger
with lower dT between stages... heat exchanger efficiancy is highly
dependant on the dT between the mediums)... Not to mention the added
weight and complexity (and the fact once you go water cooling, your
cooling system is absolutely mission-critical to the aircraft's
operation) and water-cooling is definitely no slam dunk in an aviation
context, especially since in an aircraft, assuring adequate airflow to
the engine is generally easier than it is on a car.

> You'd be a braver man than I if you were to take to the skies with
> such an arrangement. Adding extra failure points in an aircraft
> powerplant is generally considered a bad idea.

Well, theoretically a well-designed turbo-compound system shouldn't
effect the operation of the motor if it fails (aside from exhaust
backpressure and/or shaft drag, which will lower your power/efficancy,
but it shouldn't kill the motor)

>The thing I find most compelling about them is the smoothness, and the
> fact that they'll generally continue to run even after a total cooling
> and/or lubrication system failure.

Yeah - many of the guys I've talked to who put in rotary engines did so
for the safety factor as much as price (which isn't that much once you
overhaul the engine) or other factors...

I'd just kill to see someone develope a steel-housing, magnesium case,
air-cooled rotary.... I've done the thermodynamic calculations, and
with a low specific heat metal such as magnesium, a modest bank of
vanes would be more than adequate to radiate the thermal energy from a
modest Wankel, especially if you keep the power output low (115 cruise,
150 peak hp)... The magnesium block would also _substantially_ reduce
the mazda's weight (not to mention no need for external cooling),
depending on the configuration you used, a 150hp dry motor (keeping the
existing mazda's iron rotors) is theoretically easy...

As I've said many times though... theory and practice are _very_
different beasts;)
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
rkleinsch121611

External


Since: Dec 09, 2004
Posts: 809



(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

scott.cragg RemoveThis @gmail.com wrote:

> After a few days of looking, There has been one which has really caught
> my eye- The BMW 'flying brick' motors, K1100 and K1200... Everything
> I read online lauds them for outstanding reliability... They produce a
> decent 100-130hp that could easily be geared down to my target RPM, and
> they seem to have a long history of aftermarket forced induction, which
> I would hope let me reduce some of the strain on the engine by giving
> it a modest 4-8psi boost and then running at a lower rpm for my target
> 115hp cruise power...

If you do a google search using the words

bmw aircraft conversions

you'll get a whole raft of information. Most of these are the airhead
boxer twins, which are well under 100 hp but that should get you
started.
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
FB

External


Since: Feb 16, 2006
Posts: 234



(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

scott.cragg.DeleteThis@gmail.com wrote:


> Mechanical stresses are _much_ more of an issue... one of my largest
> fears with a motorcycle engine is the need to run the engine at very
> high piston velocities to achieve the power ranges I'm looking for... I
> would hope to someone alleviate this by running a boosted engine
> optimized for low engine speeds, and keeping the engine under half of
> its design speed... This trades piston speed for torque load on the
> internal components - but if the engine is engineered well enough, this
> is often a worthwhile trade-off.

Looking at a BMW K1200RS engine, which produces 85 ft/lbs of peak
torque at 6750 RPM, I calculate

mean piston speed = 0.166 * 2.955 inches * 6750 = 3311 feet per minute.

That's not so bad at all. Older engine designs were considered to be
"pushing" the limits at about 4500 feet per minute and high performance
Ducati Corsa engines are exceeding 5000 feet per minute, reducing
engine life drastically.

But 3311 / 4500 = 0.74. If you wanted to run the engine at 4500 ft.min,
you'd have to rev it up to 9200 RPM.

> The other thing I am actively considering is some form of
> turbo-componding (reverse supercharger hooked tot he exhaust, feeding
> exhaust energy directly back into the driveshaft)... the obvious
> advantages of such an arrangement are the concept of purely 'free'
> energy - that is, energy that would have otherwise been completely
> wasted out the tail pipe getting put back into the system... the
> gearing requirements for turbo compounding are fairly stringent
> however... I need to look more into how to assure that my exhaust
> turbine drives the shaft, and not the other way around...

Well, since you'd be running at a constant speed, you could pick a
turbine that's efficient at cruising RPM or climb RPM. Looking at one
of those hotrodding books on turbocharging several years ago, I learned
that there were "efficiency islands" in the
turbocharger graphs and, in order to get a turbo charger that "spooled
up" rapidly, you needed less clearance between the compressor rotor and
the outer case. So it probably works the same way with an energy
recovery turbine, the clearance is probably critical.
>
> Other motorcycle engines which have caught my eye are the Harley
> V-twins... Specifically, taking two 1200cc Evolution motors and running
> them on the same drive shaft, opposed 180 degrees and lying flat

When I saw brand new EVO engines sitting on a pallet at a motorcycle
aftermarket accessory store, I immediately wondered what a kit plane
powered by a big twin would be like. But the engines cost about $4500
each, and needed a drive system.

> I have a special love of the Wankel rotary concept... I just think its
> frustrating that no-one has taken the time to produce a true aviation
> version of it

Curtiss Wright didn't do that in the 1970's?
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
LJ1

External


Since: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 88



(Msg. 10) Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

equipment
>> that lives under the modern car's hood.
>
> It does cut both ways, water-cooling is a pain because water is limited
> to ~212 degrees F. before you boil your radiator over... This is bad
> in both the thermodynamic sense (higher combustion chamber temperature
> = higher combustion efficiancy) and complexity (a staged heat-exchanger
> with lower dT between stages... heat exchanger efficiancy is highly
You say you have a degree in engineering, but most grease monkeys could tell
you that a pressurized cooling system, particularly one with 50/50 coolant,
not water will increase that bp significantly. Hmm
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
scott.cragg

External


Since: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 5



(Msg. 11) Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:14 am
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Yes yes, silly me- I should have said boiling point, not 212...

Yes, modern engines pressurize the radiator... yes this is good for
another couple dozen degrees F (Irc, somewhere around 250F at 15psi
above 1atm)... Oh, the fact that you now have a mission critical
system under pressure? not so good (only exascerbated by altitude of
course, but you knew that)... the more efficiant you make the system
(higher operating temp) the higher you need to run the pressure so the
greater the chance of failure... not to mention, where you could have
just one heat exchange grid with a dT of ~400-500 degrees F, you now
have two heat exchangers, each operating at a measily 200 degree dT
(_very_ rough approximation)... so each heat exchanger is crippled, and
the only way to keep your dT up is to pump massive volumes of water
through the system, adding yet another point of failure...

And I'm not even getting to the issues of localized boiling, and the
subsequent drastic loss of eat exchange efficiancy... That kicks in
while your mean water tempuratures are still well below boiling...

And I'm not saying that water-cooling is the devil... its a comprimise,
like all of engineering. It gives you design flexibility - the ability
to place your primary heat exchanger in the most effective location, at
the cost of substantially reduced efficiancy, increased complexity, and
increased weight...

Obviously the trade-off is worth it in road-bound vehicles... I'm not
100% convinced that aircraft are in the same boat...

Now, I've never claimed to be an aeronautical engineer (although I have
been reading a great deal lately about both engine and aeronautical
design)... My statement above is _PURELY IN MY HUMBLE OPINION_... I am
not the smartest guy in the world, by any streach of the imagination...

What I am trying to do is have a decent and, what I have found so far
to be mature and interesting technical discussion with a bunch of guys
who know a shitload more about the technical aspects of a particular
kind of motor than I have... I'm sorry if that bugs you.
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
The Older Gentlema2

External


Since: Nov 16, 2003
Posts: 3251



(Msg. 12) Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:55 am
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

scott.cragg.TakeThisOut@gmail.com <scott.cragg.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:

> It does cut both ways, water-cooling is a pain because water is limited
> to ~212 degrees F. before you boil your radiator over


Cooling systems are pressurised systems and therefore the boiling point
is raised significantly.

This is why, when a radiator bursts, you get a huge cloud of steam,
because he water inside, as the pressure drops, boils instantly and
spectacularly.


--
Trophy 1200 750SS CB400F CD250 x2
GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 YTC#3
BOF#30 WUSS#5 The bells, the bells.....
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
ROBERT MILLER

External


Since: Jan 02, 2006
Posts: 102



(Msg. 13) Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:55 am
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Rick Cortese" <ricortes DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:yPlOf.1823$Bj7.428@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> scott.cragg DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Recently, I have been taking a very serious look at building a
>> kit-plane. Among the many aspects of this has been the search for an
>> engine. All of the various kits in my price range call for an 80-140
>> horse powerplant, obviously- lightweight and reliablility are key.
>>
>> For many reasons (cost actually being among the least), certified
>> aircraft engines are not particularly appealing to me, and I'm
>> currently researching my alternatives.
>>
>> There is quite the cottage industry currently in Auto->Aviation
>> adaptations, centering primarily around Subaru and Mazda rotary
>> engines... This works great in the 400lb, 200hp+ class of engines, its
>> not particularly useful to my selection of lighter airframes.
>>
>> Hense my question-
>>
>> I am looking for an engine with the following properties-
>> - Total Gross mount Weight < 240lbs (Engine + intake/induction +
>> exhaust + cooling)
>> - power ~ 150hp max... able to run at 115hp output for extended periods
>> of time (I'll use reduced gearing to go from engine speed to prop
>> speed, so I don't care what speed the engine needs to run at)
>> - Decent fuel burn - 5-8 gph at 75% power (the aformentioned 115hp
>> setting)
>> - RELIABLE
>>
>> Are there any particular motorcycle engines that I should look at?
>
>
> Just my op but you would probably be better off w/o a motorcycle engine.
> 115hp extended and 150hp max are at the upper limit of what is available.
> The only engines that come as separate engine/transmission that I can
> think of are the V-twin Harley types. You may want to look at someplace
> like Dennis Kirk to get and idea of what is available. You could get one
> of the unit engine/transmission types to work, but it would cost a bundle
> to modify. Other then the BMWs you mentioned the only other engines known
> for that type of reliability would be the Honda Goldwing.
>
> You may find a snowmobiles would make better candidates as engine donors.

snowmobiles would be great, they run at high rpm for long times. but still
need to put some time in to it. for app.
 >> Stay informed about: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. 
Back to top
Login to vote
LJ1

External


Since: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 88



(Msg. 14) Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 9:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Making Motorcycle Engines Fly... Litterally. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Single Cylinder Engines - Ok, so here's what I've been tasked to do Build a system to produce smooth sinusoidal oscillations with a variable stroke of up to 8" and variable frequency up to 30hz. The driver required will be around 3 hp. since this is supposed to be running ...

Who has a copy of The basic design of twostroke engines fr.. - I am looking for the first book of prof blair the basic design of twostroke engines. If you willing to sel a copy give me a mail. Regards Tjark Heeres

Speakers... Making your own setup? - Just wondering if anyone else had tried this before i go at it. I bought some 3.5in speakers, nice Infinity's, a small 150 watt amp, and two PVC 3in pipe caps. The ID of the cap is 3.5in, OD is a little under 3.75. I looked around at the 4in speaker..

GPS Motorcycle Tracking - I'm a month or two away from moving my Suzuki sv650s up to Northern VA and I'm told that motorcycle theft is pretty common where I live. Have any of you had experience with any of the GPS tracking systems that are on the market? Google turned up..

Motorcycle Tachometer - Can someone recommend a good waterproof tachometer for a 2004 VTX1300c. Thank you. John
   Motorcycle Magazine (Home) -> Tech All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]