Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes

"Bernd Felsche" <bernie.RemoveThis@innovative.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
news:cvtr55x2sj.ln2@innovative.iinet.net.au...
> Damien <al.qaeda.RemoveThis@asio.gov.au> wrote:
>>G-S wrote:
>>> George W. Frost wrote:
>
>>>> And who cares if things did happen a year or five ago, if it hasn't
>>>> been heard then it is worthwhile
>
>>> I'm not sure if that's true, but lets assume that it is for the sake of
>>> argument.
>
>>> Even if it's true... it's been heard *lots of times*.
>
>>> Welcome to 2001.
>
>>Whether it's true or bullshit, new or old...if you don't find it funny,
>>no one ever said you still had to laugh, did they? So what's the problem?
>
> It was a bunch of LIES.
>
> They weren't 2007 vintage as purported.
>
> You might like being told lies. Or just keep your mouth shut while
> being fed bullshit.
>
> I don't. So I call the lie a lie when I see it.


You are such a wanker Bernd


> /"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
> \ / ASCII ribbon campaign | Great minds discuss ideas;
> X against HTML mail | Average minds discuss events;
> / \ and postings | Small minds discuss people. -- Eleanor
> Roosevelt
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

On Jan 14, 5:29 pm, Yeebers <y... DeleteThis @yeeb.yeeb> wrote:
> Hey they were funny in 2004 or something.. I don't mind you found them
> funny, just the misrepresentation. George carries on too so it's fun to
> rile him up. Sure others do the same to me
>

ferry nuff
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

"George W. Frost" <frosty.RemoveThis@iceworks.org> wrote:
>I know that these came from the good old USA, but worth passing on on a
> Monday.
> there is some motoring references

8< rest of BS snipped >8

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Welcome to 1994!

--
Urban.legends.from.the.late.20th.century.
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

"Damien" <al.qaeda.RemoveThis@asio.gov.au> wrote in message
news:fmgv8v$8sj$1@aioe.org...
>


> It was the first time I'd seen it. Just because it's a repeat for some
> people doesn't mean it is a repeat for everyone else. I'm sure I could
> post things myself that others had seen a million times but you'd never
> seen before yourself. If you've seen it before, is it really so hard to
> just ignore it and leave it to those who haven't? Unless the complaints
> are for the sake of complaining alone, I really don't see the value in
> otherwise wasting so much time getting so annoyed by it?

Your statement here typifies what is getting to be the norm for not only
this , but many other groups as well

The attitude being:
***If you don't like whatever is posted, then whinge and moan about it***

I see something I haven't seen before, post it and sit back and watch the
flood of abusive replies.

It doesn't seem to matter to some that they can sit at a computer all day
when they should be working and others can only get to a computer one or two
times a day.

No wonder this country is going downhill at a great rate
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

"Just JT" <Johnnythor DeleteThis @Hotmale.com> wrote in message
news:478be19a$0$5001$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>
> "George W. Frost" <frosty DeleteThis @iceworks.org> wrote:
>>I know that these came from the good old USA, but worth passing on on a
>>Monday.
>> there is some motoring references
>
> 8< rest of BS snipped >8
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Welcome to 1994!

wanker, stay in 1994

Have you ever watched a movie, looked at a book, a photo album, your bank
balance twice or more?
same as reading a joke more than once
get over it....................

if you have seen it and don't like it, then piss off!!
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

"Damien" <al.qaeda RemoveThis @asio.gov.au> wrote in message
news:fmgv8v$8sj$1@aioe.org...
> It was the first time I'd seen it. Just because it's a repeat for some
> people doesn't mean it is a repeat for everyone else. I'm sure I could
> post things myself that others had seen a million times but you'd never
> seen before yourself. If you've seen it before, is it really so hard to
> just ignore it and leave it to those who haven't? Unless the complaints
> are for the sake of complaining alone, I really don't see the value in
> otherwise wasting so much time getting so annoyed by it?

The jokes posted where old and fake. These things are only really funny if
they're true. People pointed out they are old and not true. What is keeping
this conversation going is not these people but people like you who are
arguing about it. While I must admit that people pointing out that jokes are
old is, well, getting old (it's really just a way to big note themselves by
saying they've heard it before), in this case it was only done to point out
the fact that they were invented from previous events. The post did claim to
be from 2007 so I think pointing out that they are old is ok in this case.

Michaek
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

Michael C wrote:
> "George W. Frost" <frosty.DeleteThis@iceworks.org> wrote in message
> news:d6Cij.2870$421.2589@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> So in effect, what you are saying is that any story that has been written
> is
>> false because you were not there in person to witness it?
>> Did man really land on the moon?, there are people who today still claim
>> that story is false
>> Is the shroud of Turin real?, there are people who say it is true
>> Is O.J.Simpson a murderer...who knows?
>
> Who knows but many of your stories are clearly false.

What makes them "clearly false"? Just your personal opinion? Here is
some space sot hat you can list your evidence that these stories never
actually happened.







Nev..
'07 XB12X
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

"Nev.." <idiot.RemoveThis@mindless.com> wrote in message
news:478c26b4$0$30828$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-
> What makes them "clearly false"? Just your personal opinion? Here is
> some space sot hat you can list your evidence that these stories never
> actually happened.

Snopes.com. Note that I didn't say they were all clearly false, some are
made up from real events.

Michael
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

Michael C wrote:
> "Nev.." <idiot RemoveThis @mindless.com> wrote in message
> news:478c26b4$0$30828$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-
>> What makes them "clearly false"? Just your personal opinion? Here is
>> some space sot hat you can list your evidence that these stories never
>> actually happened.
>
> Snopes.com. Note that I didn't say they were all clearly false, some are
> made up from real events.

So you have no evidence that some of these things never happened. Just
evidence that things like them did happen.. which is not the same as
evidence that these things did not happen. Clearly you cannot
substantiate your allegation.

Nev..
'07 XB12X
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

"George W. Frost" <frosty.TakeThisOut@iceworks.org> wrote:
>
> "Just JT" <Johnnythor.TakeThisOut@Hotmale.com> wrote in message
> news:478be19a$0$5001$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>
>> "George W. Frost" <frosty.TakeThisOut@iceworks.org> wrote:
>>>I know that these came from the good old USA, but worth passing on on a
>>>Monday.
>>> there is some motoring references
>>
>> 8< rest of BS snipped >8
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Welcome to 1994!
>
> wanker, stay in 1994
>
> Have you ever watched a movie, looked at a book, a photo album, your bank
> balance twice or more?
> same as reading a joke more than once
> get over it....................
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~
I have. But I don't post on usenet to annoy people.


> if you have seen it and don't like it, then piss off!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Any and all usenet posts are FREE GAME.

--
If.you.don't.want.a.reply.then.don't.post.
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

Nev.. wrote:
> Michael C wrote:
>> "Nev.." <idiot.DeleteThis@mindless.com> wrote in message
>> news:478c26b4$0$30828$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-
>>> What makes them "clearly false"? Just your personal opinion? Here is
>>> some space sot hat you can list your evidence that these stories never
>>> actually happened.
>>
>> Snopes.com. Note that I didn't say they were all clearly false, some are
>> made up from real events.
>
> So you have no evidence that some of these things never happened. Just
> evidence that things like them did happen.. which is not the same as
> evidence that these things did not happen. Clearly you cannot
> substantiate your allegation.
>
> Nev..
> '07 XB12X

Steady on Nev. He's going full-steam just to hit the right letters to
form recognisable words in the first place, and you want him to make
sense at the same time?
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

"Michael C" <mculleyNOSPAM.RemoveThis@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>
> "Damien" <al.qaeda.RemoveThis@asio.gov.au> wrote in message
> news:fmgv8v$8sj$1@aioe.org...
>> It was the first time I'd seen it. Just because it's a repeat for some
>> people doesn't mean it is a repeat for everyone else. I'm sure I could
>> post things myself that others had seen a million times but you'd never
>> seen before yourself. If you've seen it before, is it really so hard to
>> just ignore it and leave it to those who haven't? Unless the complaints
>> are for the sake of complaining alone, I really don't see the value in
>> otherwise wasting so much time getting so annoyed by it?
>
> The jokes posted where old and fake. These things are only really funny if
> they're true. People pointed out they are old and not true. What is
> keeping
> this conversation going is not these people but people like you who are
> arguing about it. While I must admit that people pointing out that jokes
> are
> old is, well, getting old (it's really just a way to big note themselves
> by
> saying they've heard it before), in this case it was only done to point
> out
> the fact that they were invented from previous events. The post did claim
> to
> be from 2007 so I think pointing out that they are old is ok in this case.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The OP should've posted to alt.jokes or any of the joke-related NG's.

--
You.post.offtopic.you.get.abused.
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes 

"Damien" <al.qaeda DeleteThis @asio.gov.au> wrote in message
news:fmhanr$80r$1@aioe.org...
> lol, so the old "I said nothing intelligent or relevant, but you
> side-stepped my question!" argument is all you have left?
>
> How pathetic. And amusing.

What on earth are you talking about? I raised a very valid point and you
sidestepped it, twice. Clearly it was a valid point by your responses?

Michael
 >> Stay informed about: Idiots of the year 2007 Monday jokes