~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent..

On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:35:43 -0700, Julie <hottie DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote:

>In article <5mijm9Fdp6iuU1 DeleteThis @mid.individual.net>,
> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra DeleteThis @man.jp> wrote:
>
>> Officer Killed In Off-Duty Crash Drove 111 MPH
>>
>> POSTED: 8:53 am PDT October 3, 2007
>>
>> MESA, Ariz. -- A Phoenix police officer who died in an off-duty crash in
>> August
>> was driving at more than 110 mph when he lost control of his car and smashed
>> into an oncoming Jeep, killing that driver too, a report shows.
>>
>> Officer Jonathan Stuart, 24, of Maricopa, was returning home from his shift
>> when
>> he crashed north of Maricopa on Aug. 11, according to the Gila River Police
>> Department report. As he sped south on State Route 347, he lost control and
>> his
>> Pontiac went airborne before smashing into the Jeep driven by fellow Maricopa
>> resident Mark J. Ream, 51.
>>
>> The normal 65 mph speed limit on that stretch of roadway had been lowered to
>> 45
>> mph at the time of the crash because of roadwork.
>>
>> Witnesses estimated Stuart's speed at between 90 and 100 mph, but Gila River
>> officers determined Stuart was driving at 111 mph when he lost control.
>>
>> The Gila River report also stated Stuart had been pulled over a week prior to
>> the accident for speeding.
>
>Lemme guess, he showed his badge and got out of the ticket! It should
>be a felony for a police officer or police officers wife /family to show
>a badge to get out of something.


LOL..... I don't think so in this case. Re-read the post,
especially the part that stated the officer was killed in the crash.
I don't think he got out of THIS one penalty free.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

"Howard" <MisterRNremove.RemoveThis@removealltel.net> wrote

>>> The Gila River report also stated Stuart had been pulled over a week
>>> prior to
>>> the accident for speeding.
>>
>>Lemme guess, he showed his badge and got out of the ticket! It should
>>be a felony for a police officer or police officers wife /family to show
>>a badge to get out of something.
>
> LOL..... I don't think so in this case. Re-read the post,
> especially the part that stated the officer was killed in the crash.
> I don't think he got out of THIS one penalty free.

Whooooooosh!
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote:
> Officer Killed In Off-Duty Crash Drove 111 MPH
>
> POSTED: 8:53 am PDT October 3, 2007
>
> MESA, Ariz. -- A Phoenix police officer who died in an off-duty crash in August
> was driving at more than 110 mph when he lost control of his car and smashed
> into an oncoming Jeep, killing that driver too, a report shows.
>
> Officer Jonathan Stuart, 24, of Maricopa, was returning home from his shift when
> he crashed north of Maricopa on Aug. 11, according to the Gila River Police
> Department report. As he sped south on State Route 347, he lost control and his
> Pontiac went airborne before smashing into the Jeep driven by fellow Maricopa
> resident Mark J. Ream, 51.
>
> The normal 65 mph speed limit on that stretch of roadway had been lowered to 45
> mph at the time of the crash because of roadwork.
>
> Witnesses estimated Stuart's speed at between 90 and 100 mph, but Gila River
> officers determined Stuart was driving at 111 mph when he lost control.
>
> The Gila River report also stated Stuart had been pulled over a week prior to
> the accident for speeding.
>
>

And if this psychopath cop had lived, nothing would have been done to
him. And he knew that and that's why he did it.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

I think I would be slightly pissed off if this "cop" ever pulled me over and
gave me a speeding ticket. Or I would blame it on karma...

John B.

"¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra.RemoveThis@man.jp> wrote in message
news:5mijm9Fdp6iuU1@mid.individual.net...
> Officer Killed In Off-Duty Crash Drove 111 MPH
>
> POSTED: 8:53 am PDT October 3, 2007
>
> MESA, Ariz. -- A Phoenix police officer who died in an off-duty crash in
August
> was driving at more than 110 mph when he lost control of his car and
smashed
> into an oncoming Jeep, killing that driver too, a report shows.
>
> Officer Jonathan Stuart, 24, of Maricopa, was returning home from his
shift when
> he crashed north of Maricopa on Aug. 11, according to the Gila River
Police
> Department report. As he sped south on State Route 347, he lost control
and his
> Pontiac went airborne before smashing into the Jeep driven by fellow
Maricopa
> resident Mark J. Ream, 51.
>
> The normal 65 mph speed limit on that stretch of roadway had been lowered
to 45
> mph at the time of the crash because of roadwork.
>
> Witnesses estimated Stuart's speed at between 90 and 100 mph, but Gila
River
> officers determined Stuart was driving at 111 mph when he lost control.
>
> The Gila River report also stated Stuart had been pulled over a week prior
to
> the accident for speeding.
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

"John B." <jlb RemoveThis @computac.com> wrote

>I think I would be slightly pissed off if this "cop" ever pulled me over
>and
> gave me a speeding ticket. Or I would blame it on karma...

In this case you'd have to blame it on resurrection.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

In article <13gahaqgl2ce339.DeleteThis@corp.supernews.com>, P. Roehling wrote:
>
> "John B." <jlb.DeleteThis@computac.com> wrote
>
>>I think I would be slightly pissed off if this "cop" ever pulled me over
>>and
>> gave me a speeding ticket. Or I would blame it on karma...
>
> In this case you'd have to blame it on resurrection.

But how many speeding tickets did this cop write before he finally offed
himself demonstrating his professional cop-school learned driving skills
that put him above the law he taxed others for breaking?
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote

>>>I think I would be slightly pissed off if this "cop" ever pulled me over
>>>and
>>> gave me a speeding ticket. Or I would blame it on karma...
>>
>> In this case you'd have to blame it on resurrection.
>
> But how many speeding tickets did this cop write before he finally offed
> himself demonstrating his professional cop-school learned driving skills
> that put him above the law he taxed others for breaking?

Huh? What does *that* matter? You think that the speeders he caught should
be let off Scot-free because the idiot cop eventually killed himself
speeding? (And while we're at it, maybe we should let convicted killers out
of prison if it can be proven that their defense attorneys cheated on their
wives?)

The fact that the cop himself broke the law has exactly *zero* effect on the
question of whether or not the drivers he ticketed were guilty.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

Brent P wrote:

>
> But how many speeding tickets did this cop write before he finally
> offed himself demonstrating his professional cop-school learned
> driving skills that put him above the law he taxed others for
> breaking?




That's a major problem with police today. They honestly believe they
are above the law.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

In article <13gauk43fe2oc23.RemoveThis@corp.supernews.com>, P. Roehling wrote:
>
> "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>>>>I think I would be slightly pissed off if this "cop" ever pulled me over
>>>>and
>>>> gave me a speeding ticket. Or I would blame it on karma...
>>>
>>> In this case you'd have to blame it on resurrection.
>>
>> But how many speeding tickets did this cop write before he finally offed
>> himself demonstrating his professional cop-school learned driving skills
>> that put him above the law he taxed others for breaking?
>
> Huh? What does *that* matter?

What does it matter? Maybe you enjoy the government's absurd laws and
being subjected to its jack booted thugs and theft, I don't.

> You think that the speeders he caught should
> be let off Scot-free because the idiot cop eventually killed himself
> speeding? (And while we're at it, maybe we should let convicted killers out
> of prison if it can be proven that their defense attorneys cheated on their
> wives?)

Got any more strawmen to build?

> The fact that the cop himself broke the law has exactly *zero* effect on the
> question of whether or not the drivers he ticketed were guilty.

Guess you do have more strawmen to build. This cop probably gave many a
lecture about the evils 'speeding' to motorists who had done nothing
wrong, and hadn't driven the least bit unsafely.

I am simply pointing out the hyprocisy of an empire where people are
ruled over. You might excuse the rulers and their thugs, I refuse to. You
might think that we are all just supposed to obey the rulers and their
thugs, but I see the empire for what it is.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote

>>> But how many speeding tickets did this cop write before he finally offed
>>> himself demonstrating his professional cop-school learned driving skills
>>> that put him above the law he taxed others for breaking?
>>
>> Huh? What does *that* matter?
>
> What does it matter? Maybe you enjoy the government's absurd laws and
> being subjected to its jack booted thugs and theft, I don't.

Maybe that's because you're an idiot. There's no such thing as a country
where there are *no* arbitrary laws and there are no "jackbooted thugs"
around to enforce them. It's how human societies are constructed. Period.

>> You think that the speeders he caught should
>> be let off Scot-free because the idiot cop eventually killed himself
>> speeding? (And while we're at it, maybe we should let convicted killers
>> out
>> of prison if it can be proven that their defense attorneys cheated on
>> their
>> wives?)

> Got any more strawmen to build?

I asked you a question, idiot, and you ducked the answer. What effect did
the cop's personal speeding record have on the speeders he busted?

The answer, in case you're too dense to understand it, is, once again,
*zero*.

>> The fact that the cop himself broke the law has exactly *zero* effect on
>> the
>> question of whether or not the drivers he ticketed were guilty.
>
> Guess you do have more strawmen to build. This cop probably gave many a
> lecture about the evils 'speeding' to motorists who had done nothing
> wrong, and hadn't driven the least bit unsafely.

Buahahahahahaha! Talk about straw men! "This cop *PROBABLY*" etc.

> I am simply pointing out the hyprocisy of an empire where people are
> ruled over. You might excuse the rulers and their thugs, I refuse to. You
> might think that we are all just supposed to obey the rulers and their
> thugs, but I see the empire for what it is.

Yeah, you're so much smarter than the rest of us, it's positively
frightening.

What a maroon.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

In article <13gauk43fe2oc23.RemoveThis@corp.supernews.com>,
"P. Roehling" <nowayjose.RemoveThis@uh-uh.edu> wrote:

> The fact that the cop himself broke the law has exactly *zero* effect on the
> question of whether or not the drivers he ticketed were guilty.

How do cops ticket speeders? By speeding. But they (the cops) should
speed since it is so dangerous? Well they are trained at such a high
degree that it is not dangerous. <---- proves this to be a falacy.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

nobody wrote:
> Brent P wrote:
>
>>
>> But how many speeding tickets did this cop write before he finally
>> offed himself demonstrating his professional cop-school learned
>> driving skills that put him above the law he taxed others for
>> breaking?
>
>
>
>
> That's a major problem with police today. They honestly believe they
> are above the law.

Well, this scumbag pig is six feet below the law ... of physics.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent.. 

In article <13gb7ldqmkrgdb5 DeleteThis @corp.supernews.com>, P. Roehling wrote:
>
> "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote
>
>>>> But how many speeding tickets did this cop write before he finally offed
>>>> himself demonstrating his professional cop-school learned driving skills
>>>> that put him above the law he taxed others for breaking?
>>>
>>> Huh? What does *that* matter?
>>
>> What does it matter? Maybe you enjoy the government's absurd laws and
>> being subjected to its jack booted thugs and theft, I don't.
>
> Maybe that's because you're an idiot. There's no such thing as a country
> where there are *no* arbitrary laws and there are no "jackbooted thugs"
> around to enforce them. It's how human societies are constructed. Period.

Ahh... you think that it's natural to be enslaved by a ruling class. No,
that's not natural. You're only too intellectually, emotionally, and
physically weak to consider something else. And BTW, you're wrong. The
Xeer is a system by which there is no government at all. Rulers and
thuggery is not by any means a natural state of being. It is only
commonplace because people choose to remain weak and ignorant and give
in.

http://www.mises.org/story/2701 If you're clueless to what the Xeer is.

>>> You think that the speeders he caught should
>>> be let off Scot-free because the idiot cop eventually killed himself
>>> speeding? (And while we're at it, maybe we should let convicted killers
>>> out
>>> of prison if it can be proven that their defense attorneys cheated on
>>> their
>>> wives?)

>> Got any more strawmen to build?

> I asked you a question, idiot, and you ducked the answer. What effect did
> the cop's personal speeding record have on the speeders he busted?

Fucktard, your question is not relevant. It is of this nature: "When did
you stop beating the shit out of your wife?"

> The answer, in case you're too dense to understand it, is, once again,
> *zero*.

No fucktard, it is you that is too dense, too stupid, too ignorant to
understand anything but arbitary rule with force. You're like an animal,
or a compliant slave you can't grasp anything beyond following the
master's orders or being beaten.

This man drove unsafely and killed others. Meanwhile as a ruler's thug he
went out punishing people who were driving safely and never killed or
even put others in danger for exceeding a number posted on the sign. It
means that the rulers and their privileged thugs are simply full of shit.
You, with your little mind can't handle that so you go back into your
mode of 'must obey the rulers' or 'else'.

In a free society, the law must make sense, the law must be followed by
those in government and in its employ. Free societies are fundamentally
different than top-down command-and-control societies. We are supposed to
be in a free one despite your love of the later.

>>> The fact that the cop himself broke the law has exactly *zero* effect on
>>> the
>>> question of whether or not the drivers he ticketed were guilty.

>> Guess you do have more strawmen to build. This cop probably gave many a
>> lecture about the evils 'speeding' to motorists who had done nothing
>> wrong, and hadn't driven the least bit unsafely.

> Buahahahahahaha! Talk about straw men! "This cop *PROBABLY*" etc.

Look up strawman.

>> I am simply pointing out the hyprocisy of an empire where people are
>> ruled over. You might excuse the rulers and their thugs, I refuse to. You
>> might think that we are all just supposed to obey the rulers and their
>> thugs, but I see the empire for what it is.

> Yeah, you're so much smarter than the rest of us, it's positively
> frightening.

Get back to work slave, don't question. That's what makes you dumb.

> What a maroon.

Nice projection.
 >> Stay informed about: ~~ Criminal Cop driving 111 MPH crashes and kills innocent..